Meet The Pilot Who Regularly Wins
Aviation Cases – even the complex ones against huge opponents
Practice Areas
Williams Commercial Law Group has a depth of experience in aviation law that makes it an unparalleled leader in the field. Daryl Williams has handled aviation cases for 40 years, including all types of claims arising from aircrafts and airports, regulatory issues, and FAA disputes. We have represented clients in all aspects of aviation law and at all levels of government.
As aviation attorneys, we have taken a leading role litigating aircraft-related disputes for aircraft manufacturers, domestic airlines, airport operators, civil aviation authorities, airline passengers, pilots, financiers, and commercial operators. The amount of experience and knowledge that Williams Commercial Law Group has in this area of the law, along with our technological expertise, enables us to efficiently and cost-effectively represent all of our clients in all matters related to aviation law.
Williams Commercial Law Group has the unique advantage of a long-standing personal interest in aviation. Daryl Williams is an active, experienced licensed pilot (commercial, multi-engine land with instrument rating), who provides expertise and helpful guidance on aviation-related cases. A pilot’s perspective is essential understanding the issues often overlooked in official case investigations and key to providing a pilot/operator view of the issues.
Our aviation background enables us to cost-effectively and efficiently represent our clients in aviation-related matters. Call us to speak with your Phoenix aviation attorney today.
Verdict/settlement for our client::
$1,777,918
Daryl Williams represented the ground-lessee of property at the City of Glendale Airport in claims against the city for discrimination and violation of federal grant assurances.
Both a state court action and a Part 16 complaint under the FARs were filed. Mr. Williams won a verdict for $1,777,918 against the city of Glendale (collected when the city’s payroll account was garnished before the notice of appeal) and an order by the FAA Administrator finding the city in violation of its grant assurances.
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us, though doing so does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established. Our description of what we believe to be superior technology and how we win cases reflects our typical approach to litigation, which we believe: (i) gives us a competitive advantage, and (ii) is responsible for any success we have had. But we do not win every case. Other lawyers may have technology or approaches that they believe gives them an advantage. Also, the results that we have obtained in other cases or that are described in our clients’ testimonials do not guarantee, promise, or predict the outcome of your case, which depends on the law, facts, and evidence specific to it.